How to give retirees the confidence to spend

Font Size:

Australia has one of the best retirement systems in the world for accumulating savings. Yet, like many other countries, we continue to struggle with how to design an efficient retirement spending system. To some extent, this can be attributed to the absence of a clear purpose as to what we are trying to achieve.

Following a recommendation by the Financial System Inquiry, the Superannuation (Objective) Bill was introduced to Parliament in 2016 to establish the primary objective of super: “to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the Age Pension”.

While it is a start, it does not provide a lot of direction. The Explanatory Memorandum provided more guidance, and two of the proposed subsidiary objectives noted at the time were to facilitate consumption smoothing over the course of an individual’s life, and to manage risks in retirement. Unfortunately, these objectives have lapsed in Parliament, so we still have some uncertainty about the overall pathway to better retirement outcomes.

More recently, in September 2019, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg announced a review into the retirement income system as recommended by the Productivity Commission in its report, Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency and Competitiveness.

The panel appointed to run this important review, released on 20 November, was given the task of identifying the facts that would help improve understanding of how the retirement income system operates and the outcomes it is delivering for Australians. The terms of reference for the review stated: “It is important that the system allows Australians to achieve adequate retirement incomes, is fiscally sustainable and provides appropriate incentives for self provision in retirement.”

In this context, the panel identified four principles to assess the performance of Australia’s retirement income system: adequacy, equity, sustainability and cohesion. This latter one, cohesion, is particularly important. How do the various parts of the system work together to improve retirement outcomes in Australia?

Retirees in ‘the middle’
It is only recently that a significant number of Australians began retiring with material retirement savings, with around 35 per cent of superannuation balances at retirement reaching $250,000 or more. Over the next 20 years, this is set to change with almost 65 per cent reaching that level. While around 15 per cent of superannuation balances will exceed $750,000 in 20 years’ time, as a proportion, retirees in ‘the middle’ will double from around 25 per cent to 50 per cent.

Retirees in this ‘middle’ group are likely to be eligible for a part Age Pension for a substantial portion of their retirement and, as a result, the means test rules will be an important consideration for them.

As we all know, the means tests are targeted to help keep the cost of the Age Pension at an affordable level as Australia’s population ages. But this also makes them complicated and more difficult for retirees to navigate.

It is also worth noting that legislation was passed in February 2019 to amend the means test rules that apply to longevity protection products with effect from 1 July 2019. Under the new rules, only 60 per cent of the purchase amount of a lifetime income stream will be an assessable asset and only 60 per cent of the payments will be income for the means tests.

These regulatory changes should, in time, promote the development of new longevity protection products such as deferred lifetime annuities (DLAs) or deferred group self-annuitisation (GSA) products, which should help retirees plan their retirement spending with more confidence. However, they add further complexity.

By way of example, consider a person who is a homeowner, who retires at age 67 with a superannuation account balance of $500,000 and who uses $50,000 to purchase a DLA. With 40 per cent of the purchase price (or $20,000) no longer counting for the assets test, this person will be entitled to $1560 per annum more in Age Pension payments for around 10 years.

The confidence to spend
Longevity risk is one of the major risks faced by retirees. The fear of running out of money and the uncertainty about how long a retiree might live causes many to try to manage their own longevity risk by spending cautiously. In addition to its favourable treatment under the means tests, a DLA partially solves that problem by providing a guaranteed amount of income for life once payments commence.

This allows retirees to more safely draw down the remainder of their savings up to that point, thereby enjoying a lifestyle that is better than would otherwise be the case during the early and more active years of retirement.

Unfortunately, DLAs and other annuity products are often criticised as being ‘expensive’. The question is: compared to what? This is often because people undervalue the insurance component of the product, but also because of the conservative nature of the investments typically backing these products. Retirees who want to leave a bequest to their family also prefer to add a death benefit to the product, which also makes them more ‘expensive’.

Maybe it’s time to go ‘back to the future’, where the annuity is a form of ‘with profits’ or unit-linked policy so that the policyholder shares the investment return (and risk). The number of units paid each year until death would remain the same, but the dollar amount would vary depending on the performance of the underlying investments selected by the retiree.

Unit-linked DLAs would have two distinct advantages over traditional annuities.

First, these products could remain invested in more growth assets during the deferral period, much like an account-based pension (ABP), with retirees able to dial down the risk profile of the investments as they get older, either by choice or automatically, via a form of life cycle investment.

Second, they would be more attractive to advisers who understand investment risk and return and can assist their clients with their choices. As annuities are not well understood in the general community, some form of guidance and/or advice will be needed to help retirees understand how DLAs and other retirement products can help them manage the various risks they will face in retirement.

Retirement Income Covenant
One of the announcements in the 2020 Federal Budget was the deferral of the Retirement Income Covenant to July 2022, to allow the findings of the Retirement Income Review to inform the discussions and any further consultation.

According to Treasury, the covenant will codify the requirements and obligations for superannuation trustees to consider the retirement income needs of their members, expanding individuals’ choice of retirement income products and improving standards of living in retirement.

The covenant is supported by a number of principles, key among them that:

    • Trustees should develop a retirement income strategy for members.
    • Trustees should offer all members a comprehensive income product for retirement (CIPR), which, by design, would provide longevity protection and some access to capital.
    • Trustees should provide guidance to help members understand and make choices about the retirement products offered by the fund.

With the release of the Retirement Income Review report and ensuing consultation on the covenant, we look forward to the introduction of new retirement income products, and the development of affordable access to better information, guidance and advice.

Together, we will then be better able to help more members secure a better retirement, where they can spend more of their savings safely, especially in the early years of retirement when they are healthier and more able to enjoy it.

Do you have confidence in your spending in retirement or your plan when you get to retirement? Are there sufficient products available? Do you understand what is available?

Andrew Boal is head of the Actuaries Institute’s Retirement Strategy Group and CEO at Rice Warner.

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Disclaimer: All content in the Retirement Affordability Index is of a general nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It has been prepared with due care but no guarantees are provided for the ongoing accuracy or relevance. Before making a decision based on this information, you should consider its appropriateness in regard to your own circumstances. You should seek professional advice from a financial planner, lawyer or tax agent in relation to any aspects that affect your financial and legal circumstances.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


Cost-of-living statistics are valuable; the ‘noise’ is not

Senior economist Matt Grudnoff offers a cautionary tale about statistics.

The card that entitles you to $500

YourLifeChoices keeps you up to date with changes that could affect your retirement.

You’ve quit full-time work, now what to do with that nest egg?

A wider range of products and services must be developed for retirees, says adviser.

Written by Andrew Boal


Total Comments: 9
  1. 0

    How long till the Federal Government reduces or takes away the Age Pension?

    • 0

      On the eve of the 2013 federal election Tony Abbott told the SBS there will be “no cuts to education, no cuts to health, no change to pensions, no change to the GST and no cuts to the ABC or SBS” under a Coalition government.
      Your Old Age Pension is safe.

  2. 0

    Surely the best way is to give a universal pension, when people are sure they’re not going to end up on a park bench then they’ll spend. Politicians have always known that that’s why they gave themselves a lifetime, indexed pension plus perks. Take the pensions away from politicians and we’ll see very different policies from government.

  3. 0

    “The age of entitlement is over” except for those who “ have a go”

  4. 0

    The issue is that there are people, mainly renters, who are struggling in old age. I realise this in iteself is a hot topic. Are these people through no fault of their own could never afford a house or are they people that wasted money? In the main I believe the former is the predominant reason and we have to go with that. There are then people with valuable houses and super who draw the age pension. The answer to me is that the pot stays the same but the system is simplified and the pot distributed differently. One assets test incorporating all assets including family home and super and the rent assistance is scrapped in favour of a higher aged pension The lower and upper thresholds will need to be revised so that the majority will end up in a similar position, those with sufficient assets will need to use them and the most vulnerable get more. There may be a need for a guarantee that the age pension will not reduce for the next few years for those affected. There also a need for major Government investment to provide subsidised housing to the aged who rent and do not need to go to an aged home.

  5. 0

    Given that covid impacts have encouraged the withdrawal of super to make ends meet won’t the superfunds be feeling a bit empty so why not allow over 75’s to put money back into super without the downsizing requirement. For example money was taken out of super to buy a investment property when the GFC was punishing super. Now we want to sell this property and at present there are no “attractive ” places to put the proceeds. If the money came out of super for a “precautionary ” reason , why not permit its return to super given the current low rates of return from available alternatives? One for Frydenberg to consider in terms of controlling the pension burden on the public purse?

  6. 0

    You write this post all over Facebook with different stories each time. And how this person can help.
    Do you get commission by referring people to them . This is not believable when your story’s of Pain and loss change.

  7. 0

    That was addressed to Tracy-zichenko

  8. 0

    I cannot understand how the goverment can espact retires the save for retirment when you are better off getting the pension and other benefits, because i’m not getting anything for my investment now.



continue reading


Enthralling, dystopian, sublime: NGV Triennial has a huge 'wow' factor

Refik Anadol: Quantum memories 2020 (render) custom software, quantum computing, generative algorithm with artificial intelligence (AI), real time digital animation...


Where to eat, drink and play on Kangaroo Island

Australia's third largest island is an oasis of pristine wilderness, premium produce and hidden secrets ripe for discovery. Easily accessible...


Will you need a vaccination to visit Australian venues?

State premiers have suggested that once vaccinations begin in Australia, those without vaccinations may be banned from visiting some venues...


Enjoy these islands while you can

Remarkable Rocks, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Greg Brave/Shutterstock Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, University of South Australia I fell for Kangaroo Island from...

New South Wales

Four fabulous events announced for Mardi Gras 2021

Mardi Gras is famous for its world-class comedy, performances, vibrant colours and characters. And this year will be no exception....


Why the royal family retreats to Scotland every year

"To aim for the highest point is not the only way to climb a mountain," wrote Nan Shepherd in her...


The five stages of losing your Airbnb virginity

Airbnb was set up more than a decade ago - first called Air Bed & Breakfast - and now boasts...


Overseas travel remains unlikely this year

As the vaccine rollout in Australia gets closer, many thoughts may be turning to exactly how long we have to...