Women earning $25,000 less than men

Font Size:

Women on average earn $25,534 less than men every year, according to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency’s (WGEA) latest gender pay gap report.

The gender pay gap for total remuneration dropped just 0.7 percentage points to 20.1 per cent in the year to March, according to the report.

Women’s average full-time base salary across all industries and occupations was 15 per cent, or $15,144 a year less than men’s.

The report said that while the gap was narrowing, all industries had a gender pay gap that favoured men, and more than 45 per cent of employers who undertook a pay gap analysis took no action to address it.

But access to paid parental leave is improving. More than 50 per cent of employers provided staff access to paid parental leave in addition to the government scheme.

WGEA chief executive Libby Lyons said even before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, Australian employers had become “complacent” about gender equality.

She said “fatigue” was kicking in at many organisations, which had been reporting data since 2013.

“They have now got to the point where they tick the box, but in order to drive changes you have to take action,” Ms Lyons said.

The WGEA’s data is based on 4943 reports from employers, covering more than four million employees, for the reporting period 1 April, 2019, to 31 March, 2020.

It indicates women’s overall position in the workforce. It does not compare like-for-like roles.

And it excludes CEOs, with just 10 of Australia’s top 200 listed companies having a female chief executive.

Libby Lyons

Workplace Gender Equality Agency director Libby Lyons says Australian employers have become complacent about achieving gender equality.(ABC News: Supplied)

Pandemic could see us go back a decade on gender equality

Ms Lyons said in the two years of the global financial crisis the gender pay gap increased by 2 percentage points and it took 10 years to fix that.

“We can’t afford history to repeat itself, for the gender pay gap to go up and for it to take a decade off what we have gained,” Ms Lyons said.

“As we move into the post-COVID recovery phase, we must make sure that women’s workforce participation is not sidelined.

“Our economic recovery depends on women having equal access to secure full-time jobs.”

Ms Lyons said she was still against introducing gender-based quotas in the way other countries had. Germany this week made it compulsory for most listed companies to have at least one woman on their board.

Ms Lyons said employers who did not take action to address pay gaps and increase women’s representation would fall behind.

“It will be to the peril of their business, to their shareholders’ dividends and to the employees that they wish to attract and retain [if employers don’t take action],” Ms Lyons said.

“I can’t think of any better stick or incentive than to ensure you drive increased productivity, increased performance and increased profitability.”

The report notes gender pay gaps are influenced by a number of factors that can include discrimination and bias.

But the pay gap is also influenced by women and men working in different industries and jobs. Women dominate part-time jobs (75 per cent) and casual roles (56.3 per cent).

Women also still take up a disproportionate share of unpaid caring and domestic work, spend greater time out of the workforce and are under-represented in senior roles.

Silhouette of a woman dressed in a business suit walking.

Women dominate part-time and casual jobs and are under-represented in senior roles.(AAP: Julian Smith)

Pay gaps by category and industry

A breakdown of the data shows every manager category and non-manager occupation had a gender pay gap for full-time employees that favours men.

The report said total remuneration gender pay gaps were influenced by a range of factors including non-salary benefits such as bonuses at senior levels, reliance on awards and collective agreements in some occupations, and the concentration of women and men in different industries.

The report recorded the largest decrease (1.8 percentage points) in the other executives/general managers category. But there was still a pay gap of $67,768 between men and women there.

And in the highest ranking ‘key management personnel’ category, the pay gap was $89,141.

There has, however, been a narrowing of the gap in five of the seven occupational categories. The only occupation with an increased gender pay gap this year was labourer, with a 0.9 percentage point rise — a gap of $15,099 a year.

Chart showing gender pay gap by occupation.

‘Financial and insurance services’ remains the industry with the highest total remuneration gender pay gap at 27.5 per cent, or a difference of $45,497 annually.

But that industry’s gender pay gap has dropped almost 2 percentage points this year and has decreased 8.6 percentage points since 2013-14.

Construction has replaced ‘rental, hiring and real estate services’ as the industry with the second-worst gender pay gap at 26.1 per cent or $36,361 annually.

The gender pay gap in the most heavily female-dominated industry — healthcare and social assistance — remained virtually unchanged (up from 14.7 per cent in 2015-16 to 15.7 per cent in 2019-20).

But even in this female-dominated industry, the pay gap is 15.7 per cent, or $16,700 a year.

The gender pay gap in the second most female-dominated industry — education and training — went up 0.4 percentage points to 9.2 per cent, or a $11,562 difference annually.

Gender pay gap shown via industry.

Almost half of all employers took no action to address pay gap

There was another increase in the number of employers analysing their payroll data for gender pay gaps (up 1.7 percentage points to 46.4 per cent), but fewer organisations were taking action to close their gender pay gaps

Among organisations that conducted a gender pap gap analysis, there was a significant drop in the number which reported taking action as a result (down 6.1 percentage points to 54.4 per cent).

More than 45 per cent of employers who undertook a pay gap analysis took no action to address it.

Chart showing analysis of gender pay gaps conducted by organisations.

The proportion of organisations reporting pay equity metrics to the executive dropped 4.7 per to 26.6 per cent and those correcting like-for-like gaps fell 2.2 percentage points to 26.7 per cent.

The only increase reported was a 2.3 percentage point rise to 9.2 per cent in the number of employers setting targets to reduce organisation-wide pay gaps.

And 68.9 per cent of employers who undertook a pay gap analysis and took no action to address it reported their analysis identified “no unexplained or unjustifiable pay gaps”.

However, the number of organisations implementing formal policies and strategies on remuneration with specific pay equity objectives is increasing.

According to the report, 63.8 per cent of organisations said they had a formal policy. Of those organisations, 43.1 per cent now have pay equity objectives in their remuneration policy and strategy.

There was also an increase in the number of employers with a formal policy or strategy to support employees experiencing family or domestic violence. It went up 6.2 percentage points to 66.4 per cent.

Paid parental leave still taken mostly by women

There has been improved access to paid parental leave. It reached a seven-year high.

For the first time since WGEA started collecting data, more than 50 per cent of employers said they provided staff access to paid parental leave, in addition to the government scheme.

But access to paid parental leave was highly dependent on the size and industry of the employer, with bigger ones generally offering more generous incentives.

Two parents hold the hands of a toddler.

Access to paid parental leave is highly dependent on the size and industry of the employer, with bigger ones generally offering more generous incentives.(Flickr: Kat Grigg)

Almost seven in 10 (69.4 per cent) of the employees had access to paid parental leave for primary carers (3,047,441 employees) and 46.4 per cent of employers offered paid parental leave for secondary carers.

Women accounted for the vast majority (93.5 per cent) of all primary carer’s leave used, with men accounting for only 6.5 per cent.

Of those employers offering paid primary carer’s leave, seven to 12 weeks was the most common length of leave.

chart showing carer's leave offered to employees.

Only 4.7 per cent of employers offered 18 or more weeks of primary carer’s leave.

Ms Lyons said it was positive that more than 50 per cent of employers said they provided staff access to paid parental leave, but overall employers needed to do more to ensure gender equality was achieved.

She said while the number of female CEOs and board directors was rising, “we are still decades away from achieving gender balance at the top levels of leadership”.

“Australian employers are on autopilot when it comes to improving gender equality,” Ms Lyons said.

“The issue is clearly not receiving the necessary attention to drive further change.”

Do you believe we will ever see parity between male and female wages? Should there be gender quotas on boards?

© 2020 Australian Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved.
ABC Content Disclaimer

 

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

Join
By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Written by ABC News

10 Comments

Total Comments: 10
  1. 0
    0

    Yep, it must be Thursday. Here we go again with the myth being spread around that there is a gender pay gap. The way that the measurements are taken is wrong just as RoboDebt was wrong. You can’t take annual earnings from tax returns and divide them by 52 to come up with a figure for weekly income. There are many factors that make this system flawed.

    No industrial agreement in Australia uses gender as a basis for an hourly rate, all workers under industrial awards enjoy the same hourly rate. However, statistics show that males are more inclined to work overtime as opposed to females and this naturally has the result of males achieving a higher income, not because they are male but because they work more hours. The more hours you work, the more money you earn. For those people who work outside awards, generally professional people, the remuneration is agreed between the employer and the employee so that comes down to the ability to negotiate, not exploitation.

    I note that the Victorian budget makes provision for hundreds of positions in the heavy vehicle industry to be earmarked for females in a futile attempt to entice more of a balance. This is like a quota system where the best person for the job may not necessarily be the one who gets it. When asked about the male imbalance in the nursing and education sector, the Treasurer sidestepped the question with amazing agility

    Paid parental leave is an interesting topic. The reverse of paid parental leave affects those who stay working, maybe single, maybe choosing not to have children, maybe unable to have children and who receive the same amount of money as those who enjoy paid parental leave. It could be argued that these people are being discriminated against for not wanting to have children. If an employee is paid to stay at home and is therefore unproductive and a temporary employee is hired to do the work, the additional cost on the business is passed on to the consumer so maybe we all pay for parental leave in one way or another.

    • 0
      0

      I overlooked casual workers. The majority of casual workers are female and this will also skew any figures to do with how much people earn. Casual workers generally work less than a 38 hour week and even with loadings it is obvious that they will earn less than a permanent employee. As a matter of interest, casual workers in Australia are just over 20% of the workforce and this percentage has been relatively constant since the late 1980’s. A lot of casual workers choose that type of employment because it suits their lifestyle, uni students, sports people, young mothers.

  2. 0
    0

    I know exactly what is meant by this gender wage gap as it happens to me and they won’t do anything about it. There are three people where I work, one man and two women. The two women are the CEO and CFO and I look after admin. Their pay is in multiples of mine so the wage gap is huge. And no they won’t do anything to fix it.

    • 0
      0

      Because you do ‘admin’ and are NOT on the same hierarchical level. CEOs and CFOs are senior management. They share the legal responsibility for the organisation between them and the Board. Admin managers (if that is your title) are not. You are a basic employee. Further, there is an industrial award for admin roles. Use it.

      Simple.

    • 0
      0

      My point exactly KSS.
      The exact argument women use.
      This gender inequality is changing, it is just taking time. Except of course the overtime differential but that can’t be counted either as gender inequality.

    • 0
      0

      I better explain “this gender inequality is changing” …. historically men had the higher paid jobs such as doctors, lawyers, CEO’s etc etc etc. So statistics said there was a gender gap and men paid higher than women. Now that women and filling more and more of these jobs that statistical difference is diminishing. Basically it’s just statistics and the lies they tell.

    • 0
      0

      * Now that women are filling more and more of these jobs

  3. 0
    0

    Again with the whining!

    And just take a look at the highest alleged ‘gaps’. They are nearly ALL industries run by unions with award wages. So what are the unions doing about it, if it really exists (and not explained by women working fewer hours for whatever reason)?

    men need to “man up” if they want parental leave. The law says they can have it so take it and stop whinging!

  4. 0
    0

    Once again I’m totally amaze that the female species is not extinct. Every time you pick up a newspaper or turn on a TV poor women are being once again disadvantaged in some manner. They could even rival the Jews in the hard-done-by stakes. How did they go on. Jacka.

    • 0
      0

      Nasty racist comment there. There’s no place for that sort of stuff in these pages.

      Most of the Jews I know went into the professions because in many countries they could not be employed in the civil service. And they were turned away from other jobs because of their race.

      They even had to make their own social and golf clubs because they were not accepted elsewhere.


FACEBOOK COMMENTS



SPONSORED LINKS

continue reading

Food and Recipes

Silky Vegan Chocolate Mousse

You may be sceptical about using tofu in a dessert, but I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. This silky chocolate...

Wellbeing

What is deep sleep and how can you get more of it?

You may have heard that adults need between seven and nine hours of sleep each night. But the quality of...

Technology News

Why you may have to buy a new device whether you want to or not

Michael Cowling, CQUniversity Australia We've probably all been there. We buy some new smart gadget and when we plug it...

COVID-19

Poll reveals support for vaccinations and compulsory masks

Fewer Australians say they would take a coronavirus vaccination now than at the outset of the pandemic, but a big...

News

How to avoid being tracked online

The internet is most likely monitoring every move you make through your computer or device and, unless you know the...

COVID-19

Aussies want Morrison to refute health misinformation

Australians are fed up with the growing spread of misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic and want Prime Minister Scott...

Nutrition

The diet that can put type 2 diabetes into remission

Consuming fewer carbohydrates can potentially put type 2 diabetes into remission. An international study involving Australia's CSIRO found that strict...

Finance

CHOICE tips to take charge of 2021

Have you made a resolution to be better with money this year? After 2020, many of us could probably do...

LOADING MORE ARTICLE...